*** Racine Taxpayers Association ***

Next Meeting

News Update

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

Issues

Positions on issues

National

Federal Budget

Federal Debt

Cap and Trade

US Congress Forum 2008

State

State Budget

County

County Budget

2010 Census

KRM Commuter Rail

City

Caledonia

Mt. Pleasant

RUSD

New Superintendent

Annual Analysis

RUSD Budget

Referendum 2011

Past Referendums

North Star

Virtual Schools

Dave Hazen

Dr. James Shaw

Tony Baumgardt

Julie McKenna

Brian Dey

C.A.R.E. Association

Gateway

Gateway Operations

Channel 4

Male participation

Building use

Non elected board

Who's Your Legislator?

About Us

Purpose

Members

Officers & Policy

By-Laws & Inc.

Sign Up

Letters From Members

Lou Handziak

Roger Pfost

 
Racine Taxpayers Association Op­poses Unified Referendums

The Racine Taxpayers Association met with Racine Unified School District Chief Financial Officer Dave Hazen and two staff mem­bers last week and 'following is a synopsis of the meeting:

RUSD stated that 3700 students, 17 percent-plus of enrollment, are special education and a discussion of the various categories ensued. At no time did we suggest reduc­ing or eliminating any necessary Special Education programs. We pointed out the district has mislead us by using special education as a significant reason for increased costs. In the past 4 years, RUSD's net cost increase for special educa­tion was $570,395. The net in­crease for all other spending was $37 million. Special Education re­ceived more state and federal aid making the increase to the district negligible.  

The desired student/teacher ratio of North Star Vision's smaller class size requires a total of 882 teachers in the classroom during the school day. RUSD.has 1662 teachers and 435 teaching assistants for a total of2,097 educators. Additionally there are 300 administrators and clerical employees, as well as 3800 community volunteers. Without a detailed justification of the current perceived excess, requesting more staff seems unreasonable.

We pointed out that student enroll­ment peaked in 2007 and RUSD forecast shows no increase through 2016. Also, the forecast does not take into account the potential loss of students due to the growth of eSchool and new "charter" or "choice" schools.

We suggested money could be saved by reducing high school from an 8-period to 7-period day. Mr. Hazen indicated the district is discussing "block scheduling" as a better alternative for both cost and student performance.  We strongly agree with that idea, however, it was promised 5 years ago and, un­til this meeting, it has never been mentioned.

RUSD, like most of the other 425 school districts in Wisconsin offer the "AP" Program for advanced learning. RUSD is the only district offering "IB" as a second advanced learning program. We questioned the need and expense of supporting both programs instead of just one since Racine students earn 50% fewer college credits than the state average.

We suggested the elimination of 4-year old Kindergarten. It is 3 hours per day, four days per week and requires busing,}eachers, space and contracting with six day­care centers. We have been wait­ing over a year for RUSD to report on the promised cost savings and performance improvements of this program.

We discussed the 53 employees assigned to the Mack Center and Racine County Detention Center and the possible use of e-school at these facilities. We also discussed 5th year seniors, part time seniors, those attending Gateway & Park­side at RUSD expense and the re­quirement to allow students to stay in school until age 21.

Many answers were summed up with; the added cost isn't that much, it's a government mandate or the programs and employees are needed to meet the needs of the students. We realized that not much has changed and that RUSD will always first ask for more money before getting serious about fiscal discipline.

Health insurance is $50 million this year and it's been a known problem for many years. The dis­trict ignored it until forced to do something. Mr. Hazen indicated some costs were state mandates and we should contact our legisla­tors. He made no mention of RUSD proposing any legislative changes to improve costs and effi­ciencies.

In conclusion, it is our opinion that Referendum Question #2 request­ing $35 million for additional staff and question #3 requesting $10 million to increase the fund bal­ance have no justification.

Question #1 requesting $83.5 mil­lion for building and renovating schools is the result of past and current school boards and adminis­trations refusal to prioritize funds for maintenance. This will be a 20-year bond with annual pay­ments of about $7 million per year.
The district should find this money within current budgets and come back to the taxpayer when promised results are being achieved.

Dennis Kisley
George Meyers
Richard Reich
Lou Handziak 
Racine Taxpayers Association, March 23, 2011

 

Supporting Fair, Responsible Taxation