*** Racine Taxpayers Association ***

Next Meeting

News Update

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

Issues

Positions on issues

National

Federal Budget

Federal Debt Ceiling

Cap and Trade

US Congress Forum 2008

State

State Budget

County

County Budget

2010 Census

KRM Commuter Rail

City

Caledonia

Mt. Pleasant

RUSD

New Superintendent

Annual Analysis

RUSD Budget

Referendum 2011

Past Referendums

North Star

Virtual Schools

Dave Hazen

Dr. James Shaw

Tony Baumgardt

Julie McKenna

Brian Dey

C.A.R.E. Association

Gateway

Gateway Operations

Channel 4

Male participation

Building use

Non elected board

Who's Your Legislator?

About Us

Purpose

Members

Officers & Policy

By-Laws & Inc.

Sign Up

Letters From Members

Lou Handziak

Roger Pfost

 
Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader?

If you are a long time member of Congress, viewing the world through the prism of Washington, D.C., the answer is probably NO.

Should we raise the "debt ceiling?" Absolutely not! No more borrowing! The reality is the money has already been committed, spent and put on the charge card. We're just waiting for the bill to come in the mail.

Must we cut government spend­ing? Absolutely yes! Big budget cuts! The reality is no congress has reduced real spending since the end of WWII.

Do we need a "balanced budget amendment" to the constitution? Absolutely yes! The reality is it must pass the House and Senate by a 2/3 majority and then be ratified by 3 8 states. There has been one amendment adopted in the last 30 years and it took 9 years to be ratified by the required number of states.

The. increased debt is real and happening now. The budget cuts will be a promise spread over the next 10 years and do not have to be honored by a future congress.

The CBO projects government spending to increase 56.5% over the next 10 years for total spending of $45.8 trillion. Congress would make us think the world is coming to an end by reducing that to a 54.0% increase, $2 trillion cut.

Stimulus plans and more discretionary spending increased govern­ment spending by 9.3% in 2008 and 17.9% in 2009. These extraordi­nary high increases are then built into the base for increasing the next 10 year budget projection. This is called "baseline budgeting;" spend more to get more. Every govern­ment entity does it.

Congress and Obama should stop talking about big deals and 10 year plans. They should do something real and meaningful. Fiscal year 2012 starts October 1, less than 2 months from now and no budget has yet been passed. In fact, congress and Obama have not passed any budget in the past 800+ days.

If the next budget is reduced to 2010 spending levels, which is more than a reasonable amount after the excessive 2008-09 increases, the 2012 budget decreases by $200 billion. The new 10 year projection would then be reduced by $2.3 trillion.

This simplistic approach is what congress would make us believe takes all their energy, brinksmanship and political skills, working around the clock to save us and our country from total financial ruin.

A 5th grader would have had it done a long time ago.

Fix the 2012 budget and then start working on cutting the 2013 budget. That would be a real accomplishment


 

School Choice Forum

Thursday evening, July 28, The Racine Taxpayers Association sponsored an "Information Forum" on School Choice. Since the choice legislation has already passed, this was not a debate, but an explanation of the implementa­tion process for interested parents, schools and community members.

T
o explain the process we were fortunate to have State Representa­tive Robin Voss, School Choice Wisconsin Analyst Terry Brown and Scholarships, Opportunities & Access in Racine (SOAR) execu­tive director Laura Sumner-Coon
.

T
here were 70 people in attendance and the first 45 minutes was informative and productive. Un­fortunately, after that,
a group of about 15 anti-choice advocates tried to control and disrupt the question and answer period with old talking points and shoutouts.

The
forum did achieve our goal of providing information regarding the implementation of school choice. However, a few interested parents left before the conclusion due to the disrupt
ions.

When the forum ended there was one clear observation to be made. Our 3 panelists opening remarks and answers to every question were done professionally, sincerely and without using notes. They knew what they were talking about. The agitators had trouble reading their own scri
pted notes.

 
RUSD FLEXIBLE SCHEDULING
Flexible scheduling is defined as creative use of the time in the school day in an attempt to match the instructional time and format to the learning needs of students.

As usual, this sounds like a good idea and at the July 18, meeting, the school board was presented with a proposal to adopt "Middle School Flexible Scheduling."

Most of the emphasis was on "common planning time" for teachers and slightly more prepara­tion time. Any benefits for the stu­dents seemed to be overlooked.

In 2000, middle school was re­duced from an 8 period day to a 7 period day which saved some money and put more minutes per day in each class period. Flexible Scheduling will return middle school to an 8 period day, shorten some class times and require six additional teachers.

Calls should be made to the Jour­nal Times and school board mem­bers demanding a much more de­tailed explanation of the need for this change and how it will benefit the student.

Supporting Fair, Responsible Taxation